A young man affiliated with the first team in a super League club is charged with indecent exposure. He refuses guilty.
It came to light when a judge on Thursday morning to take position on any navneforbud.
the Case is about the transmission of images and video of sexual nature to a woman under 15 years of age, and the man refuses is guilty of all the charges, explained his lawyer, Peter Kragh.
Sidstnævte argued navneforbud, because according to him, the risk of exposing the accused to play for an unnecessary infringement by the repeal of a navneforbud, like that the case does not relate to an offense of such gravity or importance for society to navneforbuddet should be repealed.
It gave the president him unsuccessful in, and the man is thus protected by a navneforbud.
Why can B. T. does not go into detail on the man’s identity.
the Prosecutor protested not against the ban.
the Investigation into the case began in January, and the incidents happened within the last half year.