Eric Dier has been charged by the Football Association and could face a hefty ban after climbing into the stand to confront a Tottenham supporter after their FA Cup exit to Norwich.

The England international saw his brother in an argument with a fan in the south stand of the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and climbed up several rows of seats to intervene.

The incident, which was investigated by the Metropolitan Police, happened after Spurs had lost a fifth-round penalty shoot-out to the Canaries on March 4.

Eric Dier has been charged with misconduct for a breach of FA Rule E3. Full statement: https://t.co/ySqBl96Qon. pic.twitter.com/AQ4SJE8TgB— FA Spokesperson (@FAspokesperson) April 23, 2020

A statement from the FA read: “Eric Dier has been charged with misconduct for a breach of FA Rule E3.

“It is alleged that the Tottenham Hotspur midfielder’s actions at the conclusion of the Emirates FA Cup fixture against Norwich City FC on Wednesday 4 March 2020 were improper and/or threatening.

“Eric Dier has until Friday 8 May 2020 to provide a response.”

The FA has warned that the case does not come with a set sanction, meaning that if Dier accepts the charge or is found guilty, his punishment will be decided by an independent panel, which could see him land a hefty suspension.

Boss Jose Mourinho was highly supportive of his player after the incident and said he hoped Dier would not be subject to a club sanction.

Mourinho said: “I think Eric Dier did something that we professionals cannot do but in these circumstances every one of us would do.

“Because when somebody insults you, and your family is there, and you get involved with the person that is insulting you, in this case a younger brother, I think Eric did what we professionals cannot do.

“But I repeat, probably everyone of us would do. I repeat, we professionals we cannot do, but I repeat I am with the player and I understand the player.”

Dier’s team-mate Dele Alli is still waiting for the outcome of his charge.

Alli was charged by the FA on February 26 for misconduct after he posted an ill-advised video on Snapchat about coronavirus a fortnight earlier and he is understood to have launched an appeal.

Alli could also face a suspension once the season can resume if his charge his upheld. Manchester City’s Bernardo Silva received a one-match ban after a similar offence in a disciplinary procedure which took six weeks from charge to punishment.

WEST HAM are facing a Football Association charge alleging they broke rules on anti-doping.

The FA have launched disciplinary proceedings against the Hammers claiming the club failed to ensure its “Club Whereabouts” information was correct on three occasions in the past year.

PA:Press Association

The Premier League club have been given a week to respond to the charges.

West Ham face sanctions under rule 14(d) of the FA regulations, which bring football into line with the laws of the World Anti-Doping Agency.

It surrounds the club making sure it provides information making it clear where their players, or at least one of their players, are at certain times of each day, for drug testers to potentially carry out random checks.

The Hammers have acknowledged receipt of the charges and have promised to work with the FA to resolve the issues.

There is no indication of any wrong-doing on behalf of any of the players, and it is understood the breaches are down to administrative errors.

One one occasion, it appears testers visited the correct block of flats to get a random sample from a player who was in the building, but they had been provided with an incorrect door number.

A West Ham spokesman said: “The breach relates to administrative oversights on The FA’s whereabouts system, for example a player’s address had been registered and the house number digits transposed, and the Club will be responding to The FA in due course.

“We would like to make it clear that the breach is a Club administrative matter and does not concern any of our players.”

It is a similar charge to the one brought against Manchester City earlier this season.

In that instance, City were fined £35,000 and given a warning after they admitted their own administrative errors had led to the rule breaches.

Unlike in other sports, the three strikes and and a ban does not apply in the same way to the way club’s administer their overall information in football.

It is likely the Hammers will be hit with a slap on the wrist and a fine if their explanation is accepted by the FA.