Cricket SA’s former head of sales and sponsor relations Clive Eksteen is taking the governing body to the Commission for Conciliation‚ Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for unfair dismissal just days after his sacking.

Eksteen was fired with immediate effect on Sunday after he was found “guilty of transgressions of a serious nature” following a lengthy disciplinary process.

The 53-year-old former player was suspended in October last year along with chief financial officer Naasei Appiah and then acting director of cricket Corrie van Zyl in a matter involving players and player contracts through players’ union the SA Cricketers’ Association (Saca).

The trio’s suspension was related to their dereliction of duty following non-payment of player fees stemming from the 2018 Mzansi Super League (MSL).

Appiah is also appealing while Van Zyl has since been reinstated.

Eksteen said he faced five counts of misconduct.

He was acquitted of the three charges‚ which related to Saca‚ and was also exonerated in the fourth charge regarding a sponsorship deal between a sponsor and a broadcaster.

Eksteen believes the fifth charge‚ relating to a sponsorship deal between a multinational company and CSA‚ was a “lesser charge” and therefore he “should not have been dismissed at all‚ let alone found guilty”.

“In these circumstance‚ I shall be immediately be referring a dispute to the CCMA regarding my unfair dismissal‚” said Eksteen in a statement on Tuesday.

The fifth charge Eksteen refers to is a sponsorship deal concluded between a multinational company and CSA for an amount allegedly less than had been approved by the governing body’s executive‚ which resulted in CSA losing out on some R1.7m in revenue.

He said he was made a scapegoat for the ineptness of others and is convinced his name will be cleared at the CCMA.

“My attorney and I are totally confident that I will be vindicated in due course. Unfortunately‚ I believe I have been made a scapegoat for the shortcomings of others and I believe further that relevant evidence has been ignored or overlooked.”

Eksteen said the fifth count was unrelated to the Saca matter and accused CSA of misinformation after the governing body said he was found “guilty of transgressions of a serious nature”.

“I was charged with five counts of misconduct. The first three counts were in respect of the Saca issue (“the Saca charges”)‚ for which I had been suspended‚ the fourth count was in respect of a sponsorship deal concluded between a Sponsor and a Broadcaster (to which CSA was not a party) (“CHARGE 4”)‚ and the fifth count alleged that i have concluded a sponsorship deal between a multinational company and CSA (“CHARGE 5”) for an amount less than had been approved by CSA Exco‚ as a consequence of which CSA “suffered financial loss‚ reputation and image” (sic).

“I was acquitted on all three of the Saca charges as well as CHARGE 4. To my astonishment‚ I was found guilty of CHARGE 5 and received the sanction of dismissa‚” said Eksteen in a statement.

Eksteen said the chair of the proceedings found that it was actually his involvement later on that was instrumental in getting Saca eventually paid.

The disciplinary proceedings against Eksteen started in November last year and were finalised in April. He subsequently lost an appeal against his sanction.

“My astonishment at my conviction of CHARGE 5 is due to‚ among others‚ the following facts: the sponsorship was signed by my superior‚ not by me; no evidence was presented of Exco having mandated a final amount for the sponsorship; and my superior in her evidence failed to mention that she had read a message from me to her‚ prior to the Exco meeting‚ in which I had told her of the current offer on the table from the sponsor.

“The Chair chose to ignore these facts‚ and plainly misunderstood the nature of the sponsorship too.

“The Chair found as follows: “I do not find that the employer established that CSA suffered reputational or image damage in relation to the conduct of the employee and whilst there was no financial in a true sense of the word for CSA‚ revenue was lost‚ as testified by witnesses. CSA accordingly lost revenue in the amount of USD$100 000.00‚ even if it was for lesser rights. I accordingly find the employee guilty of charge 5.”

Eksteen said the chairperson’s finding that revenue in the tune of R1.7m was lost was directly contradicted by the evidence of CSA’s employees. He accused the chairperson of bias.

“Subsequent to my conviction‚ I presented evidence in mitigation. This included a variety of testimonials. The Chair refused to accept pertinent testimonials into evidence.

“She also refused to accept that CHARGE 5 was a minor charge‚ way less serious than the Saca charges on which I had been acquitted.

“In addition‚ I am in possession of evidence which exculpates me‚ which has come to light after the conclusion of the disciplinary inquiry‚ which evidence was known to CSA at the time.

“My reputation and integrity have been severely questioned and tarnished‚ and I believed the disciplinary process would allow me the opportunity to lay out the facts around my suspension as well as subsequent allegations levelled against me.”

Cricket SA’s former head of sales and sponsor relations Clive Eksteen is taking the governing body to the Commission for Conciliation‚ Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for unfair dismissal just days after his sacking.

Eksteen was fired with immediate effect on Sunday after he was found “guilty of transgressions of a serious nature” following a lengthy disciplinary process.

The 53-year-old former player was suspended in October last year along with chief financial officer Naasei Appiah and then acting director of cricket Corrie van Zyl in a matter involving players and player contracts through players’ union the SA Cricketers’ Association (Saca).

The trio’s suspension was related to their dereliction of duty following non-payment of player fees stemming from the 2018 Mzansi Super League (MSL).

Appiah is also appealing while Van Zyl has since been reinstated.

Eksteen said he faced five counts of misconduct.

He was acquitted of the three charges‚ which related to Saca‚ and was also exonerated in the fourth charge regarding a sponsorship deal between a sponsor and a broadcaster.

Eksteen believes the fifth charge‚ relating to a sponsorship deal between a multinational company and CSA‚ was a “lesser charge” and therefore he “should not have been dismissed at all‚ let alone found guilty”.

“In these circumstance‚ I shall be immediately be referring a dispute to the CCMA regarding my unfair dismissal‚” said Eksteen in a statement on Tuesday.

The fifth charge Eksteen refers to is a sponsorship deal concluded between a multinational company and CSA for an amount allegedly less than had been approved by the governing body’s executive‚ which resulted in CSA losing out on some R1.7m in revenue.

He said he was made a scapegoat for the ineptness of others and is convinced his name will be cleared at the CCMA.

“My attorney and I are totally confident that I will be vindicated in due course. Unfortunately‚ I believe I have been made a scapegoat for the shortcomings of others and I believe further that relevant evidence has been ignored or overlooked.”

Eksteen said the fifth count was unrelated to the Saca matter and accused CSA of misinformation after the governing body said he was found “guilty of transgressions of a serious nature”.

“I was charged with five counts of misconduct. The first three counts were in respect of the Saca issue (“the Saca charges”)‚ for which I had been suspended‚ the fourth count was in respect of a sponsorship deal concluded between a Sponsor and a Broadcaster (to which CSA was not a party) (“CHARGE 4”)‚ and the fifth count alleged that i have concluded a sponsorship deal between a multinational company and CSA (“CHARGE 5”) for an amount less than had been approved by CSA Exco‚ as a consequence of which CSA “suffered financial loss‚ reputation and image” (sic).

“I was acquitted on all three of the Saca charges as well as CHARGE 4. To my astonishment‚ I was found guilty of CHARGE 5 and received the sanction of dismissa‚” said Eksteen in a statement.

Eksteen said the chair of the proceedings found that it was actually his involvement later on that was instrumental in getting Saca eventually paid.

The disciplinary proceedings against Eksteen started in November last year and were finalised in April. He subsequently lost an appeal against his sanction.

“My astonishment at my conviction of CHARGE 5 is due to‚ among others‚ the following facts: the sponsorship was signed by my superior‚ not by me; no evidence was presented of Exco having mandated a final amount for the sponsorship; and my superior in her evidence failed to mention that she had read a message from me to her‚ prior to the Exco meeting‚ in which I had told her of the current offer on the table from the sponsor.

“The Chair chose to ignore these facts‚ and plainly misunderstood the nature of the sponsorship too.

“The Chair found as follows: “I do not find that the employer established that CSA suffered reputational or image damage in relation to the conduct of the employee and whilst there was no financial in a true sense of the word for CSA‚ revenue was lost‚ as testified by witnesses. CSA accordingly lost revenue in the amount of USD$100 000.00‚ even if it was for lesser rights. I accordingly find the employee guilty of charge 5.”

Eksteen said the chairperson’s finding that revenue in the tune of R1.7m was lost was directly contradicted by the evidence of CSA’s employees. He accused the chairperson of bias.

“Subsequent to my conviction‚ I presented evidence in mitigation. This included a variety of testimonials. The Chair refused to accept pertinent testimonials into evidence.

“She also refused to accept that CHARGE 5 was a minor charge‚ way less serious than the Saca charges on which I had been acquitted.

“In addition‚ I am in possession of evidence which exculpates me‚ which has come to light after the conclusion of the disciplinary inquiry‚ which evidence was known to CSA at the time.

“My reputation and integrity have been severely questioned and tarnished‚ and I believed the disciplinary process would allow me the opportunity to lay out the facts around my suspension as well as subsequent allegations levelled against me.”

England winger Nikita Parris apologised to former teammate Eniola Aluko on Wednesday for her public display of support to former England coach Mark Sampson.

The moment occurred when Parris scored for England against Russia during a match in 2017. Sampson had been accused of racially abusing Aluko and another player, Drew Spence, but Parris ran to Sampson and celebrated the goal with her boss.

READ MORE: Anthony Joshua tells critics of protest speech: ‘If you think I’m a racist, go f*** yourself!’

READ MORE: Olympic athletes face bans if they make Black Lives Matter protests at Tokyo Games

An inquiry into Sampson’s comments at the time ruled that he was guilty and was sacked from his position a day after Parris’ celebration.

Parris, who plays for Lyon in France, wrote an open letter to Aluko and posted it on her twitter page. It read: “Eni, I am sorry that my thoughtless actions caused you hurt.

“At the time I focused more on what I believed was showing unity when really it did nothing of the sort, it showed a lack of empathy, understanding and ignorance by singling out a voice who needed an ear to listen and a support system to help.

“I am now able to understand how I have been part of the problem which I aim to fight and eradicate.

“I am a proud black woman, I understand I have a social responsibility to help create change through my platform.”

More

Immediately after the incident, Aluko called the celebration “naive”. She also said: “Some of them may have a special relationship with Mark Sampson and they have every right [to celebrate with him], but I think about the sensitivity at that time, and it wasn’t respectful.”

The FA sacked Sampson for what they described as “clear evidence of inappropriate and unacceptable behaviour by a coach”.

More

They also apologised to Aluko and Spence, ruling that Sampson “made comments that were “discriminatory on the grounds of race”.

After England, Sampson went on to coach at League Two club Stevenage in July 2019. In September he was accused of using racist language in a coaches’ meeting. He was charged by the FA in November of that year, but in January 2020 that charge was dismissed out of court with an FA independent commission dismissing the claim.